Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Date: 2004-12-03 08:25:59
Message-ID: 41B02317.7020201@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Robert Treat wrote:
<snip>
> OK, but what about dotgeek? They provide a valuable service to the
> community by giving free webhosting with postgresql. Are they a
> community sponsor too ? Heck, by that token the Open Source Technology
> Group ought to be listed as well, since we have software available from
> both sourceforge and freshmeat, along with several important side
> projects.

Interesting thought.

Um, I think the distinction here is that Elein is intimately personally
involved in the PostgreSQL Community and spends a lot of time and effort
to further our Community *specifically*.

If the people of dotgeek and OSTG were consistently doing the same, then
we'd probably consider them a lot more "part of the family" than we do.

Does that yardstick make sense?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2004-12-03 12:00:55 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Previous Message Justin Clift 2004-12-03 08:16:34 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-12-03 08:41:42 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Previous Message Justin Clift 2004-12-03 08:16:34 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"