| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: latest plperl |
| Date: | 2004-07-01 20:38:21 |
| Message-ID: | 40E4763D.5050005@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joe Conway said:
>>As a side note, I think it would be *really* helpful if there were a
>>more comprehensive test script, and an expected results file available.
>> Not sure though if it could be included in the standard regression
>>tests on a configure-conditional basis -- anyone know?
>
> To the best of my knowledge you cannot. We will provide an analogue for
> pltcl's test directory shortly, if that is desired - it will probably take a
> few days, though. I assume that will be acceptable after feature freeze?
Yup, I think that falls into Tom's "loose ends" category.
>
> At a quick glance, modulo the makefile change, the patch looks good.
Great! I'll commit shortly.
Thanks,
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-07-02 00:18:03 | Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32 |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-07-01 18:40:24 | Re: pg_tablespace_databases |