Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

From: Martino Serri <mserri(at)tin(dot)it>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this
Date: 2004-06-11 08:26:34
Message-ID: 40C96CBA.7050301@tin.it (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian wrote:
 > That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu.  Many are running
 > the same configuration just fine.
 >

Thank you for the answer.

Yes, this is a PentiumIII 800Mhz.


I've searched on /src/include/storage/s_lock.h and i've found this line.

#ifdef HAVE_SPINLOCKS
#error PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this ...

I suppose that would be

#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCKS

It's correct?

Martino.

-- 
"- in Italia cosa rischia uno che tortura?
- ..Se รจ una tortura e via, poco.. Se ha anche scaricato musica da 
Internet, quattro anni"
Sergio Staino (Bobo e figlia, maggio 2004)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Christian van der LeedenDate: 2004-06-11 09:10:50
Subject: Re: A memory leak. Postgres 7.4. Mac OS. X Server
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-10 19:02:42
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group