Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

From: Martino Serri <mserri(at)tin(dot)it>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this
Date: 2004-06-11 08:26:34
Message-ID: 40C96CBA.7050301@tin.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu. Many are running
> the same configuration just fine.
>

Thank you for the answer.

Yes, this is a PentiumIII 800Mhz.

I've searched on /src/include/storage/s_lock.h and i've found this line.

#ifdef HAVE_SPINLOCKS
#error PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this ...

I suppose that would be

#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCKS

It's correct?

Martino.

--
"- in Italia cosa rischia uno che tortura?
- ..Se è una tortura e via, poco.. Se ha anche scaricato musica da
Internet, quattro anni"
Sergio Staino (Bobo e figlia, maggio 2004)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian van der Leeden 2004-06-11 09:10:50 Re: A memory leak. Postgres 7.4. Mac OS. X Server
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-10 19:02:42 Re: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this