Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> The problem with doing it in-house is that the folks who can work on it
> and maintain it will be taking time away from developing PostgreSQL.

Not sure that using Gerrit solves this. Someone will need to install it,
maintain it, document, and hack it. Yes, hack it, as it is not a
drop-in solution.

...
> I think one of them has, now: Gerrit. http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

I use Gerrit in the MediaWiki project, and it ain't pretty. The interface
is confusing, the workflow is more complex, and the MediaWiki folks have
had to do a lot of work to make things usable, despite their having a
non-email-centric workflow already.

Maybe we can identify specific issues with our current app instead?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201302081106
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlEVIqcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh04gCfaK80dbuL8NnAVuViGR5sFQXN
GzwAoM+2fcI6+zFZPqkslZrWjkZ05AOo
=azLj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----