From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Date: | 2013-02-08 15:58:27 |
Message-ID: | 16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory,
and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their
tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
sure that the reviews get archived.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2013-02-08 15:59:13 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-02-08 15:57:12 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2013-02-08 16:07:42 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-02-08 15:32:50 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |