| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Date: | 2004-04-21 17:48:48 |
| Message-ID: | 4086B400.7070606@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that
the components in contrib are considered more supported/recommended than
similar solutions found on gborg or any other external site, I suggest
we move the projects dbmirror and dblink to gborg. The rserv contrib
module seems to me to be an early Perl prototype of erserver, nobody is
working on any more. I suggest we drop that entirely.
Comments/alternatives?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-04-21 18:16:14 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Previous Message | Erwin Moller | 2004-04-21 15:52:19 | Re: Is this possible? concatenating results from a subquery |