| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Date: | 2004-04-21 18:17:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200404211817.i3LIHa102766@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that
> the components in contrib are considered more supported/recommended than
> similar solutions found on gborg or any other external site, I suggest
> we move the projects dbmirror and dblink to gborg. The rserv contrib
> module seems to me to be an early Perl prototype of erserver, nobody is
> working on any more. I suggest we drop that entirely.
>
> Comments/alternatives?
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-04-21 18:49:54 | valgrind errors |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-04-21 18:16:14 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |