| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |
| Date: | 2004-03-25 01:59:26 |
| Message-ID: | 40623CFE.2040800@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>(6) possible inclusion in postgresql?
>> - among other contributions? what about contrib/advisor?
>> - added to template1 on default installation?
>> maybe not for a first release? or yes? it is easier to communicate
>> about
>
> I think we're going to want a gborg project for developing/coordinating tests
> anyway. Having the schema included in contrib/ might help adoption, but so
> would pgadmin/phpgadmin. Any client-builders reading this? What do you think?
Both phpPgAdmin (me) and the pgAdmin team have added or have thought
about adding some 'schema analysis' features to our products. If
pg_advisor is available, I certainly won't bother and I will just
recommend to people that they install it.
I think it probably should live in userland...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-25 02:01:40 | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-03-25 01:06:23 | PostgreSQL ES3.0 problems? |