Re: Log rotation

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Date: 2004-03-12 20:21:57
Message-ID: 40521BE5.5030004@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Lamar,

Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 09:24 am, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
>>I don't really care on how its done, but IMO an enterprise class
>>database must be able to do log rotation. Logging to Syslog is not an
>>option (specially with our verbosity) -- users must be able to use flat
>>files for logging.
>
>
> Uh, we have many many many different ways to use syslog. So my other message
> on the topic.
>

Which other message?

Anyway, Syslog is not an option for us. We need flat files.

>
>>I never seem some many customer complaints and bug reports about a
>>single item like the ones we have received here about logging. I think
>>this should be the number 1 item in te TODO list.
>
>
> Uh, upgrading? I'm sure we have more reports about upgrading than logging.
>

Yeah, but that only comes with a full version upgrade :-)

The logging one keeps popping up as people try and use the server for production.

> But see my reply to bug 103767 for more.

See my reply to your reply ;-)

Best regards,
Fernando

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-03-12 20:29:40 Re: Log rotation
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2004-03-12 20:19:29 Re: Log rotation