From: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
Date: | 2004-03-12 20:21:57 |
Message-ID: | 40521BE5.5030004@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Lamar,
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 09:24 am, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
>>I don't really care on how its done, but IMO an enterprise class
>>database must be able to do log rotation. Logging to Syslog is not an
>>option (specially with our verbosity) -- users must be able to use flat
>>files for logging.
>
>
> Uh, we have many many many different ways to use syslog. So my other message
> on the topic.
>
Which other message?
Anyway, Syslog is not an option for us. We need flat files.
>
>>I never seem some many customer complaints and bug reports about a
>>single item like the ones we have received here about logging. I think
>>this should be the number 1 item in te TODO list.
>
>
> Uh, upgrading? I'm sure we have more reports about upgrading than logging.
>
Yeah, but that only comes with a full version upgrade :-)
The logging one keeps popping up as people try and use the server for production.
> But see my reply to bug 103767 for more.
See my reply to your reply ;-)
Best regards,
Fernando
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-03-12 20:29:40 | Re: Log rotation |
Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2004-03-12 20:19:29 | Re: Log rotation |