From: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
Date: | 2004-03-12 20:19:29 |
Message-ID: | 40521B51.6000401@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> I can see their problem with making a dependency to all of apache or including
> multilog in their distribution. But they probably could include something
> that is only a logger either using some project that is only a logger or
> splitting out the logger that is bundled with apache. Then it wouldn't
> be unreasonable to make a dependency for postgres requiring that logging
> rpm. Other services could also make use of this logging package as well.
>
Yes that would be nice. I have no idea how difficult it would be to extricate
the logrotate program from Apache. I also don't know if there would be any
license restrictions, would we be able to redistribute it as an independently
package? I don't know the answer.
Regards,
Fernando
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2004-03-12 20:21:57 | Re: Log rotation |
Previous Message | Manfred Spraul | 2004-03-12 20:17:41 | Re: libpq thread safety |