Re: Log rotation

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Date: 2004-03-12 20:19:29
Message-ID: 40521B51.6000401@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> I can see their problem with making a dependency to all of apache or including
> multilog in their distribution. But they probably could include something
> that is only a logger either using some project that is only a logger or
> splitting out the logger that is bundled with apache. Then it wouldn't
> be unreasonable to make a dependency for postgres requiring that logging
> rpm. Other services could also make use of this logging package as well.
>

Yes that would be nice. I have no idea how difficult it would be to extricate
the logrotate program from Apache. I also don't know if there would be any
license restrictions, would we be able to redistribute it as an independently
package? I don't know the answer.

Regards,
Fernando

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Nasser 2004-03-12 20:21:57 Re: Log rotation
Previous Message Manfred Spraul 2004-03-12 20:17:41 Re: libpq thread safety