Re: Clustered Postgresql

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clustered Postgresql
Date: 2004-02-16 20:21:49
Message-ID: 4031265D.8070704@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 15:02, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>>Rod Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040129/lath071_1.html
>>
>>Is it really true what they claim: linear scalability with new nodes
>>(for reads)? This seems like a 'better replication than replication'.
>

Well just about any replication can give you that... My curiousity lies
in how well they scale with writes.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> I don't know.
>
> It is possible, but I would assume it's not intended for clusters
> smaller than 4 to 8 standard machines.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-16 21:43:12 Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-02-16 20:11:50 Re: Clustered Postgresql