Re: Clustered Postgresql

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clustered Postgresql
Date: 2004-02-16 20:11:50
Message-ID: 1076962310.18564.92.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 15:02, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040129/lath071_1.html
>
> Is it really true what they claim: linear scalability with new nodes
> (for reads)? This seems like a 'better replication than replication'.

I don't know.

It is possible, but I would assume it's not intended for clusters
smaller than 4 to 8 standard machines.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-02-16 20:21:49 Re: Clustered Postgresql
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-02-16 20:02:05 Re: Clustered Postgresql