Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium

From: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date: 2004-02-09 17:18:17
Message-ID: 4027C0D9.2040702@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John Gibson wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I need to upgrade my dual Xeon PostgreSQL engine.
>
> Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad
> Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the
> PostgreSQL code is written for 32 bit and not optimized for the 64 bit
> Itanium cpu. That makes me think that the Xeon system would be a better
> choice.
> '

Bang for the buck per CPU you are best off using an Opteron based
solution from AMD. This will give you the 64bit address space that Xeon
can't but for a heck of a lot less money than an Itanium.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> Do any of you have thoughts on:
>
> 1. Straight performance capability
> 2. Price/Performance
>
>
> I would appreciate any feedback you might have.
>
>
> ...john
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 347 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lincoln Yeoh 2004-02-09 17:18:43 Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Previous Message Ed L. 2004-02-09 17:17:41 Re: Increasing Max Connections Mac OS 10.3