| From: | Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: nomenclature |
| Date: | 2004-01-16 16:56:20 |
| Message-ID: | 400817B4.5000007@idigx.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Thomas Swan wrote:
>
>
>
>>Perhaps postgresd, postgresqld, or pg_daemon might be a little more
>>intuitive?
>>
>>
>
>I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could
>be a bit difficult and confusing, no? :) I'd go with something like
>pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with
>just pgd ...
>
>But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on
>this ...
>
>
>
Agreed, to change it would be a bit insane. Although a little insanity
often surrounds a major version release...
I just thought the anecdote of confusing it for an MTA was a little funny.
Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Brusser | 2004-01-16 17:00:08 | cache control? |
| Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2004-01-16 16:35:03 | Re: nomenclature |