| From: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: nomenclature |
| Date: | 2004-01-16 16:35:03 |
| Message-ID: | 16392.4791.115966.727994@kelvin.csl.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could
> be a bit difficult and confusing, no? :) I'd go with something like
> pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with
> just pgd ...
>
> But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on
> this ...
If it's ever going to happen then the likely place would be in a Linux
distribution or a re-package of PostgreSQL. I'm sure no one would be
suprised if Red Hat had a new release with dbd, ~db, sql (or keeping
PostgreSQL in it pgsqld, ~pgsql, pgsql)...
Indeed a lot of the current inconsistencies are packaging issues...
L.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-01-16 16:56:20 | Re: nomenclature |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-16 16:27:15 | Re: nomenclature |