Re: missing COMMENT ON objects

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Date: 2003-10-09 04:15:44
Message-ID: 3F84E0F0.3040408@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something
>> about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT <oid> would be good too.
>
>
> * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ]
>
> Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll
> have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item?

Actually, what about COMMENT ON LANGUAGE as well?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 04:29:45 Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 03:40:07 Re: _GNU_SOURCE