Re: missing COMMENT ON objects

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Date: 2003-10-09 03:17:26
Message-ID: 3F84D346.9030409@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following:
>>* Cast
>>* Conversion
>>* Operator class
>>Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight?
>
>
> Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something
> about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT <oid> would be good too.

* COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ]

Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll
have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 03:17:38 Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-10-09 02:41:30 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)