Re: massive quotes?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: massive quotes?
Date: 2003-09-12 15:44:08
Message-ID: 3F61E9C8.9020206@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>I'd like to see pg_dump use this mechanism for quoting, at least for
>>function bodies. I guess it could retrieve the text and then keep
>>generating delimiters until it found one that didn't occur inside the
>>text.
>>
>>
>
>Right, that was what I had in mind.
>
>

great

>
>
>>Maybe for that purpose we could allow underscores as well as
>>letters - I don't think that should introduce any extra ambiguities.
>>Alternatively, or as well, maybe leading and trailing digits could be
>>disallowed, but embedded digits could be allowed. IOW let's be as
>>liberal as possible without breaking things.
>>
>>
>
><shrug> I'd prefer to keep the rules as simple as possible. No
>particular objection to underscores, but allowing digits in only some
>places seems confusing.
>
>
>
We already do - you can't begin an identifier with a digit. I'm not
dogmatic about it, though. I'd be more than happy with just what you
proposed.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:45:04 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-12 15:43:35 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines