Re: massive quotes?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: massive quotes?
Date: 2003-09-12 15:20:44
Message-ID: 11506.1063380044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'd like to see pg_dump use this mechanism for quoting, at least for
> function bodies. I guess it could retrieve the text and then keep
> generating delimiters until it found one that didn't occur inside the
> text.

Right, that was what I had in mind.

> Maybe for that purpose we could allow underscores as well as
> letters - I don't think that should introduce any extra ambiguities.
> Alternatively, or as well, maybe leading and trailing digits could be
> disallowed, but embedded digits could be allowed. IOW let's be as
> liberal as possible without breaking things.

<shrug> I'd prefer to keep the rules as simple as possible. No
particular objection to underscores, but allowing digits in only some
places seems confusing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:28:48 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Terry Yapt 2003-09-12 15:13:34 PostgreSQL on Novell Netware 6.5.