From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
Date: | 2003-09-12 15:20:44 |
Message-ID: | 11506.1063380044@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'd like to see pg_dump use this mechanism for quoting, at least for
> function bodies. I guess it could retrieve the text and then keep
> generating delimiters until it found one that didn't occur inside the
> text.
Right, that was what I had in mind.
> Maybe for that purpose we could allow underscores as well as
> letters - I don't think that should introduce any extra ambiguities.
> Alternatively, or as well, maybe leading and trailing digits could be
> disallowed, but embedded digits could be allowed. IOW let's be as
> liberal as possible without breaking things.
<shrug> I'd prefer to keep the rules as simple as possible. No
particular objection to underscores, but allowing digits in only some
places seems confusing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 15:28:48 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Terry Yapt | 2003-09-12 15:13:34 | PostgreSQL on Novell Netware 6.5. |