| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Al Sutton <al(at)alsutton(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
| Date: | 2003-01-21 20:59:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3E2DB494.66915E72@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Al Sutton" <al(at)alsutton(dot)com> writes:
> > I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> > code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> > unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> > existing windows-only developers to work on the code.
>
> You think we should drive away our existing unix developers in the mere
> hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it isn't going to happen.
A compromise is a solution that makes all sides equally unhappy ... so
we should convert our build environment to ANT? Hey, just kidding ;-)
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-21 21:32:07 | Re: targetlist functions part 1 (was [HACKERS] targetlist |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-21 20:17:53 | Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted |