Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Al Sutton" <al(at)alsutton(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Postgres development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Date: 2003-01-21 20:17:53
Message-ID: 10850.1043180273@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Al Sutton" <al(at)alsutton(dot)com> writes:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only developers to work on the code.

You think we should drive away our existing unix developers in the mere
hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it isn't going to happen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-01-21 20:59:01 Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-21 20:11:51 Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE AS/SELECT INTO