Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage?

From: David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage?
Date: 2002-06-22 02:10:37
Message-ID: 3D13DC9D.8080506@blue-labs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On the other hand, I like hints on how to do things better ;)

David

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

>>So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)?
>>
>>
>
>OK, if we are still voting, then I'll mention that I generally dislike
>the idea of notices of this kind. And would not like this notice in
>particular. So would vote no with both hands ;)
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-06-22 02:11:32 Re: SQL99, CREATE CAST, and initdb
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-06-22 01:38:12 Re: Reduce heap tuple header size