| From: | Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? |
| Date: | 2002-06-22 02:17:22 |
| Message-ID: | 125479039.1024687042@[10.1.2.207] |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Which is whay you RTFM ;)
--On Friday, June 21, 2002 10:10 PM -0400 David Ford
<david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org> wrote:
> On the other hand, I like hints on how to do things better ;)
>
> David
>
> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
>>> So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> OK, if we are still voting, then I'll mention that I generally dislike
>> the idea of notices of this kind. And would not like this notice in
>> particular. So would vote no with both hands ;)
>>
>>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-06-22 02:58:07 | test 2, first failed ... |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-06-22 02:11:32 | Re: SQL99, CREATE CAST, and initdb |