Re: Stability, PR

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stability, PR
Date: 2002-05-23 13:08:22
Message-ID: 3CECE9C6.7A8BD62A@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

(For those who don't run across Linux Journal, Reuven has been giving
PostgreSQL some nice exposure on a regular basis.)

> Given the frequency with which I've heard such claims from otherwise
> well-informed people, I'm wondering if there's anything we users can
> (or should) do to counter this misinformation.

One of the nicest things about the PostgreSQL team is the lack of FUD
and marketing fluff. To a fault, and to an extent not seen in other
database products, including other open source database products.

How does one prove something? By developing a history of success, not by
claiming it. And folks like yourself help a lot by showing success.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message molinet 2002-05-23 13:33:02 historical of postgreSQL
Previous Message Joel Burton 2002-05-23 13:07:11 Re: no pg_hba.conf