Re: Proposed relaxation of CREATE RULE syntax

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net> writes:
> > I suggest that the CREATE RULE syntax be relaxed so that
> > it is legal to have a list of SELECT commands in a rule.
>
> I don't have any strong objection to this myself, but it would probably
> be a good idea to wait and see what Jan thinks of it before we change
> it. (Kevin, Jan Wieck is the main developer of our rules stuff, and
> is more likely to know about any gotchas in the idea than the rest of
> us.) I think Jan is still in Poland someplace, but hopefully he'll
> be back in touch before long.
>
> > 2) It breaks nothing (more things become legal)
>
> Given our earlier discussions, it might only be that it exposes things
> that don't work :-(.
>
> regards, tom lane

Of course, wait for the guy in charge of this area. It's
not urgent for
me anyway, because I'm going to be working with a variant
pretty soon
anyhow, to support my research. (I'm gonna have to do things
in the
backend that you would not want distributed).

++ kevin

--
Kevin O'Gorman (805) 650-6274 mailto:kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net
Permanent e-mail forwarder:
mailto:Kevin.O'Gorman(dot)64(at)Alum(dot)Dartmouth(dot)org
At school: mailto:kogorman(at)cs(dot)ucsb(dot)edu
Web: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kogorman/index.html
Web: http://trixie.kosman.via.ayuda.com/~kevin/index.html

"There is a freedom lying beyond circumstance,
derived from the direct intuition that life can
be grounded upon its absorption in what is
changeless amid change"
-- Alfred North Whitehead