Tom Lane wrote:
> I always thought that CLUSTER was being redundant in the other
> direction: if you've told it the index name, there's no need to
> tell it the base table name. It can find that out from the index.
>
Good point. That would make the most sense:
CLUSTER index_name
if index_name was a primary key to a table, then there's no need to specify
the table.
-Tony