Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95

From: Ron Chmara <ron(at)opus1(dot)com>
To: Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>
Cc: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>, Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95
Date: 2000-02-23 16:21:53
Message-ID: 38B40921.B61B25B7@opus1.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Marten Feldtmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de wrote:
> >
> > Is there really an interest in spending the extra money for a
> > Windows license to build a less reliable database server?
> >
>
> Hmmm, try to think about an application, which normally runs on a server,
> but then is also wanted (with much less data) on a notebook ...

I'm writing this email to you from a notebook. Running Linux. And Postgres.
:-) So, it's already being done (Notebooks aren't the issue here, I believe
it's an issue of OS choices).

-Bop

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barnes 2000-02-23 16:48:19 scheduling table design
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-23 15:54:46 Re: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS