Re: [HACKERS] Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change
Date: 2000-01-25 01:57:53
Message-ID: 388D0321.D0A08D43@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > The primary graphics files should be .cgm files, but I see that we
> > only have those for one or two cases. The .ag files are Applix
> > Graphics files, which I use to embed the stuff into hardcopy.
> > I'll see about updating them, and committing a .cgm version of each.
> If the .ag files are derived files, meseems they should not be in
> the CVS tree at all?

Easy for you to say, you're not formatting the hardcopy :)

Seriously, I'm not certain that we can use .cgm format as a lossless
way for me to get figures into the hardcopy. But it seems like it
should work; my recollection is that Hannu helped test out formats
with me and we settled on .cgm as the most likely to succeed.

As soon as we have a complete set of .cgm files, and as soon as I've
tried generating hardcopy and jpegs or gifs for the .html, then we can
deep-six the .ag versions. In the meantime, it makes it easier on me
if we keep carrying those files in cvs.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-25 01:58:43 RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-25 01:50:15 DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace