Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Date: 2009-01-18 21:30:03
Message-ID: 37ed240d0901181330nba0f65csd06cdd45b09f4bc0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've applied a patch for this to HEAD and 8.3.
>

Cool, thanks Tom.

Just noting that I've tested your fix on both branches, and in both
cases pg_dump's output came out nice, clean and consistent.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Mansion 2009-01-18 23:58:30 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-18 20:47:06 Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses