| From: | Wolfgang Hottgenroth <wn(at)kja-essen(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | woho(at)ieee(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |
| Date: | 1999-10-02 15:32:07 |
| Message-ID: | 37F62577.43286F68@kja-essen.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi Thomas, hi all,
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > did anyone of you ever saw some strange problems with large objects and
> > the postgresql 6.51?
>
> I don't work with Large Objects, but I am pretty sure that the
> behavior was changed/fixed for v6.5 to *require* all large object
> manipulation to happen within a transaction. This was always a
> requirement, but Postgres did not enforce it and had some potentially
> bad behavior lurking as a result.
Have many thanks for that fast answer. It is new to me, that
large-object-operations requires transactions. Did I read the manual to
fast or isn't it written down there?
I will try it.
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-02 15:33:26 | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-02 15:24:17 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release |