Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: woho(at)ieee(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects
Date: 1999-10-02 15:06:54
Message-ID: 37F61F8E.FEF2A538@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> did anyone of you ever saw some strange problems with large objects and
> the postgresql 6.51?

I don't work with Large Objects, but I am pretty sure that the
behavior was changed/fixed for v6.5 to *require* all large object
manipulation to happen within a transaction. This was always a
requirement, but Postgres did not enforce it and had some potentially
bad behavior lurking as a result.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-02 15:08:36 Perl5 selftest failure (was Re: Questions about vacuum analyze)
Previous Message Wolfgang Hottgenroth 1999-10-02 07:48:45 problems with large-objects