Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?
Date: 1999-10-01 15:03:44
Message-ID: 37F4CD50.42C2D5F3@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> is it correct that a nesting of subtransactions is not possible with
> postgres at the moment?
> (I didn't find a TODO entry for this (even at 'exotic' features))

There has been some discussion of this. The fact that it is disallowed
by SQL92 is *not* the reason we don't have the feature, but it may be
responsible for it not yet being done...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-01 15:45:40 Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-01 14:54:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR()