Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?
Date: 1999-10-01 15:45:40
Message-ID: 199910011545.LAA01305@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hello,
>
> is it correct that a nesting of subtransactions is not possible with
> postgres at the moment?
> (I didn't find a TODO entry for this (even at 'exotic' features))

We don't support it, but will add to TODO now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-10-01 16:00:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR()
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-01 15:03:44 Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?