Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Uncle George <gatgul(at)voicenet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Date: 1999-07-20 15:21:45
Message-ID: 37949409.7EF3F967@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

> > RedHat is interested in doing a maintenance release of Postgres
> > rpms
> I have fixed just enough to get the regression
> tests to work.
> BTW I'd really love to have a redhat 6.0/alpha cd but not at the going
> price of $79.00

I heard that Costco (a discounting volume retailer) has the grey-box
(MacMillan?) version of RH6.0 for $25...

> What is PORTNAME. i ( as well as others ) use uname.

It is defined in src/Makefile.global. We would need to be able to
check for both OS (linux) and architecture (alpha); perhaps Bruce's
recent change to give a "CPU" variable is just what we need. I'll add
the PORTNAME check to the relevant Makefile.

If you can send patches for what you have changed, I can incorporate
them into an RPM for testing (built on a RH5.2-i686 box, but the
source rpm can be rebuilt on yours).

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-20 15:29:32 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Counting bool flags in a complex query
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-20 15:12:06 Re: [HACKERS] Contributing

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herouth Maoz 1999-07-20 15:28:18 Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL 6.5 on Solaris 2.6
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-20 15:00:52 Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL 6.5 on Solaris 2.6