Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Date: 1999-07-20 14:47:41
Message-ID: 37948C0D.9695497D@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'm happy to kibitz while someone else redesigns it, but I don't
> think I'm qualified to be the lead dog...

Well, that's OK, I barely know what a query tree is. But I think I
know what I want for outer join behavior. Let's keep talking if you
are mucking with the query tree stuff...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Uncle George 1999-07-20 14:58:39 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-07-20 14:27:26 Re: [HACKERS] psql & query string length