From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |
Date: | 1999-06-29 04:04:16 |
Message-ID: | 377845C0.6AF3DFC9@krs.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > We are two weeks after the 6.5 release, and the anticipated
> > problems/patches/porting issues never really materialized.
> > I would suspect that fewer people are using PostgreSQL, but I know that
> > is not true. Seems the two months of beta really got out the bugs.
>
> I think we did pretty well.
First time for last two years -:)).
> > What do people want to do now? Does anyone want to start on 6.6? Do we
> > want to release 6.5.1? Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> > the stable release?
>
> IMHO we do need to make a 6.5.1 release --- I know I have a couple of
> stupid bugs in 6.5 :-(. But it is not urgent; we could wait another
> couple of weeks and see if anything else pops up.
>
> Probably the nearer decision is when to split the tree for 6.6.
> Is anyone ready to start on new stuff for 6.6? The argument that
> we wanted to avoid double-patching is looking less compelling with
> so few patches, so I'm ready to see a tree split as soon as anyone
> has anything to commit into 6.6 only...
I have nothing yet. But I just made changes to avoid
disk writes for read-only transactions (now speed of
selects is the same as with -F) - should I put it
in 6.5.1 or wait for 6.6?
Vadim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-29 04:04:43 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-29 03:59:30 | Re: [HACKERS] acl problem in NetBSD/m68k |