Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused
Date: 1999-09-17 21:47:41
Message-ID: 372.937604861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
>> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
>> last moment. Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
>> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
>> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.

> It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.

But the point is, if the most recent version had been in the development
tree, we'd have had a better shot at noticing that its makefile was
missing...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-18 01:34:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: attdisbursiont
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-09-17 21:44:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: attdisbursiont