Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
> >> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
> >> last moment. Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
> >> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
> >> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.
>
> > It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.
>
> But the point is, if the most recent version had been in the development
> tree, we'd have had a better shot at noticing that its makefile was
> missing...
>

I guess. The new pgaccess release was so different than the current
one, I just cvs removed all files, and readded everything. That is how
Makefile go lost.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026