Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: kar(at)webline(dot)dk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC and Perl
Date: 1999-03-04 02:33:01
Message-ID: 36DDF0DD.8CDD0506@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > > Looks like not, unless I'm forgetting a feature...
> > That's why I asked. So I hope it will be compatible with Perl's
> > Math-BigInteger module.
> NUMERIC isn't INTEGER data!

Oh, btw numeric() seems to work great on my Linux/libc5 box. The last
time I reported that it had troubles...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 1999-03-04 04:40:40 inet and cidr type problems
Previous Message James Thompson 1999-03-04 02:08:14 Re: [GENERAL] Postgre superuser?? (fwd)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-03-04 02:41:01 Re: [HACKERS] parser enhancement request for 6.5
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-03-04 02:26:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'