| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | dustin sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements |
| Date: | 1998-12-10 09:05:00 |
| Message-ID: | 366F8EBC.C3AE3DCC@krs.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
dustin sallings wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> // Vadim has already starting throwing in code for this...his plan
> // is for v6.5 release (~3months) for this to be in place...
>
> Interesting...will this help out vacuuming any?
No. Vacuum will still exclusively lock relation. But
I'll fix vacuum to unlock pg_class (when vacuuming all tables
in database).
And note - this will be not row level locking, but
multi-version concurrency control.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurent DELVAUX | 1998-12-10 10:21:07 | |
| Previous Message | dustin sallings | 1998-12-10 08:21:57 | Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sferacarta Software | 1998-12-10 13:31:59 | Re[2]: [HACKERS] gram.y |
| Previous Message | Oleg Broytmann | 1998-12-10 08:57:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |