RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
Date: 1998-12-14 01:51:08
Message-ID: 001101be2704$38197ee0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 1998 6:05 PM
> To: dustin sallings
> Cc: The Hermit Hacker; Kaare Rasmussen; pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
>
>
> dustin sallings wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > // Vadim has already starting throwing in code for this...his plan
> > // is for v6.5 release (~3months) for this to be in place...
> >
> > Interesting...will this help out vacuuming any?
>
> No. Vacuum will still exclusively lock relation. But
> I'll fix vacuum to unlock pg_class (when vacuuming all tables
> in database).
>


> And note - this will be not row level locking, but
> multi-version concurrency control.
>

What does it mean ?
LLL in 6.5 doesn't include row level locking ?

Thanks.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-14 08:03:12 Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
Previous Message Bill Sneed 1998-12-14 01:07:26 Re: [GENERAL] Money

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-12-14 01:54:43 Re: [HACKERS] vnsprintf()
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-12-14 01:33:54 vnsprintf()