From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, vadim(at)krs(dot)ru |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? |
Date: | 1998-12-05 06:03:22 |
Message-ID: | 3668CCAA.C5B41E32@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It's feature and thus must NOT be committed to the RELEASE
> tree. But if you send me the patches, I could add it to the
> v6.4.1 feature patch which I'll put into the patches
> directory on the ftp server after v6.4.1 is out.
I'm thinking that it will lead to nothing but trouble. How about waiting
for v6.5?
> > If anyone has a chance to look at the new code wrt the rewriter
> Did it add new node types? If not, the rewrite system might
> already be happy with it. Anyway - I'll take a look at it and
> check/extend/fix for the rewrite corner.
Yes, it added new node types (CaseExpr and CaseWhen), and I added a few
lines to rewriteHandler.c to pretty much ignore them. Not sure if that
was the right thing to do.
- Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 1998-12-05 08:54:00 | Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays] |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-12-05 06:01:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? |