From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Date: | 2005-10-13 17:01:40 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f0510131001l348ac8cbna18d7f61bf04e8b0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Actualy to me, it seems like postgres is a perfect partner for MS Access.
Throw out Jet, and use Pgsql. It's infinately better than Jet, so operating
in a Win98 environment seems reasonable in this scenario.
I swear you could build a business just building MS Access apps on a
Postgresql databases so that they can actualy _scale_ when a business grows.
Alex
On 10/13/05, Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Alex Turner wrote:
>
> > Support for windows 98 was infact extended to June 2006:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifean1
> >
> Right....
>
> And it was extended again last year as it was supposed to extend this
> last June, and Last June, etc. We will see if it is not extended again....
>
> But if you are running an production database on Windows 98 you have
> bigger problems than support from Microsoft....
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> Metatron Technology Consulting
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-13 17:07:30 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
Previous Message | Alex Turner | 2005-10-13 17:00:03 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-10-13 17:05:15 | Re: Question about stored procedures |
Previous Message | Alex Turner | 2005-10-13 17:00:03 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |