Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3?
Date: 2005-09-01 17:17:08
Message-ID: 3253.1125595028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> writes:
> doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml says:

There's a number of things not updated yet in that file :-(
I believe it hasn't heard of pg_twophase either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-09-01 17:28:29 Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-09-01 17:13:31 Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas