Re: [HACKERS] Re: Trouble with float4 after upgrading from 6.5.3 to 7.0.2

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Romanenko Mikhail" <mikhail(at)angg(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Trouble with float4 after upgrading from 6.5.3 to 7.0.2
Date: 2000-08-07 15:57:18
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000808015718.0281ad70@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

At 11:35 7/08/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Perhaps the old way of considering equality only to float accuracy
>is more useful, even though it opens us up to problems like overflow
>errors in "float4var = 1e100". Comments anyone?
>

The following frightened me a little:

pjw=# select float4(10.1);
float4
--------
10.1
(1 row)

pjw=# select float8(float4(10.1));
float8
------------------
10.1000003814697
(1 row)

I would have expected the latter to be at worst 10.10000000000000 +/-
.00000000000001.

Am I missing something?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-08-07 16:04:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Trouble with float4 after upgrading from 6.5.3 to 7.0.2
Previous Message Len Morgan 2000-08-07 15:55:38 pg_dump help

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-07 15:57:30 Re: mac.c
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-08-07 15:56:35 Re: was: bad datatypes time and timestamp - wrong gcc option