| From: | "Priem, Alexander" <ap(at)cict(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Chris' <list(at)1006(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: data=writeback |
| Date: | 2004-04-08 09:26:17 |
| Message-ID: | 2A07EC2D0BC2774AAD6F74769F60D52A0832C8@ahmose.cict_ad.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql ext3
> > noatime,data=writeback 1 2
> > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql/wal ext3
> > noatime,data=ordered 1 2
>
> The same label mounted on two different mount points is probably I typo?
No, the same label mounted on two different mount points is not a typo. This
is the way it is in my /etc/fstab.
Note that I did not create this file myself, it was created by the RedHat
Enterprise Linux 3 ES installer. I created different partitions for the data
directory (/usr/local/pgsql) and the wal directory (/usr/local/pgsql/wal)
using the installer and this is how the /etc/fstab file ended up.
Why, is this bad? They use the same label, but use different mount points?
Can this cause problems?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cosimo Streppone | 2004-04-08 09:43:49 | select count(*) on large tables |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2004-04-08 09:01:29 | Re: data=writeback |