Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date: 2001-11-24 22:10:29
Message-ID: 29925.1006639829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> So we just mention it is going away, but there are duplicates so they
> can't start removing -o yet?

Well, we'd have to give a table of recommended translations, eg

-o '-S n' => --sort-mem=n

The translations all exist already, but we've got to start telling
people to quit using the old switches, or we'll never be able to clean
them up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-24 22:12:31 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-24 22:03:15 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?