Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date: 2001-11-24 22:03:15
Message-ID: 200111242203.fAOM3Fj08679@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is there no overlap in the postgres/postmaster flags?
>
> Yeah, there is. That's why we need to give people warning of what
> we intend to break. See prior thread.

So we just mention it is going away, but there are duplicates so they
can't start removing -o yet?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-24 22:10:29 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-24 22:00:40 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?