Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date: 2002-03-22 19:07:54
Message-ID: 2952.1016824074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> BTW, is NULLABLE so ugly that no one wanted to comment on it?

I kinda liked it, actually, if we were going to use the SET syntax.
But people seem to be focused in on this "let's make it look like
CREATE" notion. I'm willing to wait and see how far that can be made
to work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-03-22 19:12:02 Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-22 19:04:19 Re: Use of PG_BINARY_R and "r"